Vegetarian Journal 2008 Issue 3

Vegetarianism in Political Magazines

By Bobby Allyn

Vegetarianism and veganism often appear in the nationís leading newspapers. From pieces about the rise of vegan-friendly retailers to vegan firefighters in Austin, Texas, The New York Timesí archives reveal many articles a year on plant-based diets. A LexisNexis search in all majors papers during a six-month period resulted in 760 hits for vegetarianism and veganismómost of which are recipes, restaurant reviews, and articles on veganismís growing pop culture allure. But how are vegetarianism and veganism covered in political magazines? Very scantly.

Over the past six years, the words vegan and vegetarian have been steadily increasing in number in all the major political magazines but never in the context of diet or lifestyle. For example, an article in The Weekly Standard quoted Mitt Romney as saying, Being a conservative Republican in Massachusetts is a bit like being a cattle rancher at a vegetarian convention. Or seen in a quote in the February 2007 edition of Mother Jones, There are people who are against birth control for religious reasons. Then there are the hippies and vegans who say no chemicals. But out of all the political magazines that I searchedóleft-, right-, and centrist-leaningóthe only one to heed an article actually about vegetarianism or veganism was a conservative publication, The National Review.

In 2003, National Review editor Rich Lowry gave Jonah Goldberg an assignment: go on a vegan diet and write about it. Reluctant and apprehensive, Goldberg took Lowry up on the offer and wrote an article for the February 2003 edition called Soy Vey! Probably a lot of National Review readers were surprised when Goldberg found veganism less painful than he had expected. After a couple days of this regimen, I felt healthier. He also conceded that vegan alternatives can be tasty. Meatless Chikín nuggets, truth be told, donít taste that bad. Nevertheless, Goldberg didnít hesitate to unleash his irrational, meat-addicted side by making analogous comparisons to cannibalism. If meat is murder, why hawk products that look like mutilated corpse… Imagine selling a faux human flesh… Wouldnít that be in poor taste? In the end, Goldberg resented Lowry for putting him on a vegan diet, but still, it was a clever experiment that proved to Goldberg and National Reviewreaders that a vegan diet can be delicious and actually make adherents feel healthier. Conclusions drawn from a more recent article in The Nation were not as positive.

In the February 2007 edition, Daniel Lazare reviewed Tristram Stuartís Bloodless Revolution: A Cultural History of Vegetarianism from 1600 to Modern Times in a piece titled My Beef with Vegetarianism. Unlike the National Review article that was an assignment specifically on veganism, Lazare decided to use the book review as a vehicle to vent his opposition to abstaining from meat. He claimed that nature is crueler than slaughterhouses and that vegetarianism is an ideology. He goes on to allege that vegetarianism has antihumanist and authoritarian elements. Being a reader of The Nation, I was shocked and annoyed by Lazareís article, but I wasnít the only one. Many online readers responded similarly, and some were vehemently outraged. Kaye Beiswanger of Minnesota said, As a vegetarian, I found this article so offensive that I canceled my subscription after being a loyal subscriber for years. And Patrick McKernan of Goffstown, New Hampshire, said, As I read the article, I kept hoping to find some indication that the author knew something, or had at least thought, about the matter at hand. Apparently not. Itís unfortunate that the only article discussing vegetarianism in The Nation in the past 10 years has been one filled with misconceptions and gross overstatements.

As my LexisNexis searches and other research conclude, vegetarianism isnít covered in political magazines. And demonstrated by articles in The National Review and The Nation, political affiliation doesnít matter when it comes to ignorance about vegetarianism and veganism. Maybe itís good that political magazines donít tackle vegetarianism, keeping the practice and lifestyle a non-partisan issue. But I think it behooves political periodicals across the nation to cover an issue that has such widespread cultural, economic, and environmental impacts as vegetarianism, not as merely a brief aside to Dennis Kucinich or Ralph Nader.

Bobby Allyn wrote this article during his Eleanor Wolff Internship with The Vegetarian Resource Group.

Excerpts from the 2008 Issue 3

Dried Fruit: Treasures to Savor All Year Round
Debra Daniels-Zeller incorporates apricots, cherries, dates, figs, prunes, raisins, and more into every course of your meal.
An Update on Rennet
Jeanne Yacoubou, MS, learns the latest about cheesemaking ingredients.
Vegan Cheese: New and Improved Versions
VRG Dietetic Intern Melanie Campbell tests products for nutrition, taste, meltability, and more.
How Many People Order Vegetarian Meals When Eating Out?
See the results of The VRGís latest poll.
Quick-and-Easy, Lower Budget Vegan Items to Serve in Institutional Settings
Chef Nancy Berkoff stretches your dollar in this Foodservice Update.
Nutrition Hotline 2
Are there links between my daughterís acne and her vegetarian diet?
Note from the Coordinators 4
Letters to the Editors 5
Vegan Cooking Tips 20
Fast Sandwich Spreads, by Chef Nancy Berkoff
Notes from The VRG Scientific Department 23
Scientific Update 24
Book Reviews 31
Catalog 33
Vegetarian Action 35
Chef Ralph Estevez: An Interview with the Team Chef of the Washington Redskins, by Melanie Campbell

The Vegetarian Resource Group Logo © 1996-2016 The Vegetarian Resource Group
PO Box 1463, Baltimore, MD 21203
(410) 366-8343   Email:

The contents of this website and our other publications, including Vegetarian Journal, are not intended to provide personal medical advice. Medical advice should be obtained from a qualified health professional. We often depend on product and ingredient information from company statements. It is impossible to be 100% sure about a statement, info can change, people have different views, and mistakes can be made. Please use your own best judgment about whether a product is suitable for you. To be sure, do further research or confirmation on your own.

Web site questions or comments? Please email